- 4 posts a week,
- A bit more direction
I'm going to stick to FIVE broad threads to keep the focus even tighter.
- Good Teaching and Curricula: to include the debate between subject-based "Chalk and Talk" teaching championed by the Conservative Party vs. competency/skills-based learning.
- Discipline: taking in behavioural management, drug policy, corporal punishment debates etc.
- Selectivity: grammar schools, streaming etc.
- Motivation/self-esteem: how far are schools implicated in this?
- Impact of computer games/internet use on children and their receptiveness to learning/ their outlook in life. This might be renamed, as I want it to take in the ADHD/Ritalin debate.
1. Good Teaching: Matthew Taylor seems spot on here: it's a false dichotomy. As Guy Claxton has shown, we shouldn't have to choose between The Tudors or Media Studies.
2. Discipline: the debate has a larger significance. Should schools should be run on utilitarian principles (prioritizing the experience of the many even if that means failing the few)? I want to learn more about Steve Heppell's Not School.
3. Selectivity seems part of the same debate. At the moment, I am very much pro-selectivity. As a classroom teacher, I didn't see my weaker students benefiting from the strongest - nor vice versa. I'm ready to be proved wrong.
4. I quote Prof. Claxton in complete agreement: "Too often children see school as posing another set of challenges, rather than as an opportunity to develop the sorts of resources needed to deal with those challenges."
5. Hmmmm.. a change of mind every day..

No comments:
Post a Comment